Measuring ENSO Predictability Sources Using Machine Learning Techniques
Keywords:
Enso, El Niño–Southern Oscillation, Machine Learning, Lstm, Random Forest, Gradient Boosting, Sea Surface Temperature, Sea Level PressureAbstract
Important global climate anomalies, such as the El Niño-Southern Oscillation (ENSO), can impact socio-economic systems, water resources, and agriculture. Strategies for disaster preparedness and climate adaptation rely on accurate ENSO event predictions. Here, we use machine learning techniques to investigate potential causes of ENSO prediction. The ENSO indices (Niño 3.4 and Niño 4) were modelled using historical records of sea surface temperature (SST), sea level pressure (SLP), and subsurface ocean temperatures. To unravel the data’s patterns, including its non-linear linkages and temporal dependencies, we employed Random Forest (RF), Gradient Boosting (GB), and Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks. To evaluate model performance, we used RMSE, MAE, and correlation coefficients for performance metrics, as well as feature importance metrics and seasonal analysis to evaluate phase-dependent predictability (i.e., modelling winter ENSO and summer ENSO). The results indicate that the LSTM model yields performance levels superior to the tree-based models and predicts the highest levels of ENSO prediction accuracy; the strongest predictors were SST anomalies in the Niño 3.4 region and subsurface temperatures. In terms of seasonal predictability, we found that ENSO events during winter months were more predictable than summer months, which aligns with phase-locking behaviour. Overall, this research shows that machine learning can provide reliable understanding of ENSO dynamics and identify the important climate drivers, which together provides a step towards better forecasting and early warning capacity.
References
Ibebuchi CC, Rainey S, Obarein OA, Silva A, Lee CC. Comparison of machine learning models in forecasting different ENSO types. Physica Scripta. 2024 Jul 30;99(8):086007.
Li T, Tang Y, Lian T, Hu A. Quantifying the relative contributions of the global oceans to ENSO predictability with deep learning. Geophysical Research Letters. 2024 Mar 16;51(5):e2023GL106584.
Liu Y, Duffy K, Dy JG, Ganguly AR. Explainable deep learning for insights in El Niño and river flows. Nature Communications. 2023 Jan 20;14(1):339.
Pal M, Maity R, Ratnam JV, Nonaka M, Behera SK. Long-lead prediction of ENSO modoki index using machine learning algorithms. Scientific reports. 2020 Jan 15;10(1):365.
Patil KR, Doi T, Jayanthi VR, Behera S. Deep learning for skillful long-lead ENSO forecasts. Frontiers in Climate. 2023 Jan 4;4:1058677.
Tang Y, Zhang RH, Liu T, Duan W, Yang D, Zheng F, Ren H, Lian T, Gao C, Chen D, Mu M. Progress in ENSO prediction and predictability study. National Science Review. 2018 Nov 1;5(6):826-39.
Wang B, Feng P, Waters C, Cleverly J, Li Liu D, Yu Q. Quantifying the impacts of pre-occurred ENSO signals on wheat yield variation using machine learning in Australia. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology. 2020 Sep 15;291:108043.
Colfescu I, Christensen H, Gagne DJ. A machine learning-based approach to quantify ENSO sources of predictability. Geophysical Research Letters. 2024 Jul 16;51(13):e2023GL105194.
Dijkstra HA, Petersik P, Hernández-García E, López C. The application of machine learning techniques to improve El Niño prediction skill. Frontiers in Physics. 2019 Oct 10;7:153.
Lima CH, Lall U, Jebara T, Barnston AG. Machine learning methods for ENSO analysis and prediction. InMachine Learning and Data Mining Approaches to Climate Science: Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Climate Informatics 2015 Sep (pp. 13-21). Cham: Springer International Publishing.