Unravelling the Threads: An Extensive Analysis of Population Growth’s Environmental Impact

  • Sneha Pandey Student, Subhash Chandra Mahavidyalaya Chakarama, Varanasi.

Abstract

The pressing challenges posed by the burgeoning global population necessitate a nuanced exploration of its environmental repercussions. This comprehensive review synthesizes the current state of knowledge surrounding the environmental impact of population growth, unraveling the intricate connections between demographic trends and ecological sustainability. As humanity treads further into the 21st century, this article seeks to illuminate the multifaceted dimensions of the issue, from resource consumption and climate change contributions to biodiversity loss and urbanization challenges. Beyond delineating the environmental consequences, the review critically evaluates existing mitigation strategies, including population policies, family planning initiatives, and technological innovations. The abstract concludes by emphasizing the imperative of global cooperation and interdisciplinary research in forging a sustainable path forward that harmonizes demographic dynamics with environmental well-being.

References

1. Carr, D. L. (2005). Population and deforestation: why rural migration matters. Progress in Human Geography,
29(6), 734-749.
2. Ehrlich, P. R., & Ehrlich, A. H. (1990). The Population Explosion. Simon & Schuster.
3. Feng, J., & Chen, Y. (1997). Population density, migration, and the returns to human capital and land: insights from Indonesia. The American Economic Review, 87(2), 311-316.
4. Jha, S., & Bawa, K. S. (2006). Population growth, human development, and deforestation in biodiversity hotspots. Conservation Biology, 20(3), 906-912.
5. Kates, R. W., & Dasgupta, P. (2007). African poverty: a grand challenge for sustainability science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(43), 16747- 16750.
6. Lambin, E. F., & Meyfroidt, P. (2011). Global land use change, economic globalization, and the looming land scarcity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(9), 3465-3472.
7. Lee, R. (2003). The demographic transition: three centuries of fundamental change. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 17(4), 167-190.
8. Lutz, W., & Samir, K. C. (2011). Global human capital: integrating education and population. Science, 333(6042), 587-592.
9. Malthus, T. R. (1798). An Essay on the Principle of Population. J. Johnson.
10. Myers, N. (1997). Environmental refugees: a growing phenomenon of the 21st century. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 352(1360), 609-613.
11. Pimentel, D., & Pimentel, M. (1996). Food, energy, and society. CRC Press.
12. Potts, D. (1996). Urbanization, gender and urban poverty: paid work and unpaid carework in the city. Environment and Urbanization, 8(2), 23-42.
13. Pretty, J., & Smith, D. (2004). Social capital in biodiversity conservation and management. Conservation Biology, 18(3), 631-638.
14. Rees, W. E. (1992). Ecological footprints and appropriated carrying capacity: what urban economics leaves out. Environment and Urbanization, 4(2), 121- 130.
15. Rockström, J., Steffen, W., Noone, K., Persson, Å., Chapin III, F. S., Lambin, E., ... & Foley, J. A. (2009). A safe operating space for humanity. Nature, 461(7263), 472-475.
16. Sen, A. (1981). Poverty and Famines: An Essay on Entitlement and Deprivation. Oxford University Press.
17. United Nations. (2019). World Population Prospects 2019. Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division.
18. World Bank. (2008). World Development Report 2008: Agriculture for Development. World Bank.
Published
2023-12-30
How to Cite
PANDEY, Sneha. Unravelling the Threads: An Extensive Analysis of Population Growth’s Environmental Impact. Journal of Advanced Research in Humanities and Social Sciences, [S.l.], v. 10, n. 4, p. 31-35, dec. 2023. ISSN 2349-2872. Available at: <http://www.thejournalshouse.com/index.php/Journal-Humanities-SocialScience/article/view/1048>. Date accessed: 18 may 2024.