To Outsource or Not to Outsource: Resource Decision-Making in the Project Management Environment
Abstract
Every organisation engages in some form of outsourcing in order to sustain their operations. The decision to outsource certain functions and the selection of the optimum providers is an important aspect of organisational strategy. Failure in respect of outsourcing could have a critical effect on an organisation, leading to losses and ultimately its termination. Failure to utilise the most efficient and effective option can also lead to problems, as competitors may improve their relative position and remove business from the organisation. The key factors in
making decisions to outsource activities are discussed. The importance of the features of the organisation and its context are emphasised. The rationale behind outsourcing is mentioned, principally this concerns the supply of products or services that the organisation would prefer not to make or perform, for various reasons. The form of the contract between the provider and client is also studied, in order to discern the key features. The option of global sourcing is considered. Organisations can move all or some of their activities overseas, termed offshoring. This paper considers outsourcing in respect of technology. The area of cloud computing is discussed, as both an illustration and a key mechanism for the provision of outsourced IT services. A thematic analysis of selected, key literatures is undertaken. A summary of factors related to outsourcing decision-making and contract formulation is provided, in order to assist practice and constitute a focus for further research.
The principal facets of an outsourcing contract are identified, utilising an empirical study.
How to cite this article: Blair G, Woodcock H, Pagano R. To Outsource or Not to Outsource: Resource Decision-Making in the Project Management Environment. J Adv Res Alt Energ Env Eco 2022; 9(3&4): 10-20.
References
Research In Social Sciences & Humanities 2021; 4(3): 15-20. Retrieved from http://ijirhsc.com/
2. Wetherly P, Otter D. The Business Environment (4/e), Oxford University Press, Oxford, England 2018.
3. Needle D. Business in Context: An Introduction to Business and Its Environment (6/e). Cengage Learning
EMEA 2015.
4. Blair G, Pagano R. A Guide for Researchers to Negotiate the Research Process. Journal of Innovative Research
in Education & Management 2021; 4(3): 1-5. Retrieved from http://ijirem.com/
5. Blair G, Pagano R, Burns B. Contingency Framework for Addressing Failure in Information Systems. Journal of
Innovative Research in IT & Computer Science 2019; 3(2): 1-4.
6. Dautovic G. “15 Crucial Outsourcing Statistics to Know in 2022 .” Fortunly 2022. [Online] [Accessed on
25th January 2022] https://fortunly.com/statistics/outsourcing-statistics
7. Aron R, Singh J.“Getting offshoring right”, Harvard Business Review 2005; 83(12): 135-43
8. Blair G, Woodcock H, Pagano R. Risk Management in the Post Pandemic Business Environment. Journal of
Advanced Research in Alternative Energy, Environment and Ecology 2021; 8(3&4): 15-21.
9. Duncan P, Wiggins A, Wright J et al. “Strategic IS/IM in Context”, in Grant K, Hackney R, Edgar, D. (eds) (2010), Strategic Information Systems Management. Hampshire, UK: Cengage Learning 2010; 139-190.
10. Blair G, Pagano R. Technology and the Environment - a Framework for a Symbiotic Relationship. Journal of
Advanced Research in Alternative Energy, Environment and Ecology 2021; 8(2): 4-8.
11. Venters W, Whitley EA.“A Critical Review of Cloud Computing”. Journal of Information Technology 2012; 27: 179-197
12. Bhattacherjee A, Park S. “Why end-users move to the cloud: A Migration-Theoretic Analysis”, European Journal of Information Systems 2013; 1-16.
13. Wang C, Wood L, Abdul-Rahman H et al.“When traditional information technology project managers encounter the cloud: Opportunities and Dilemmas in the Transition to Cloud Services”, International Journal of Project Management 2016; 34: 371-388.
14. Fahmideh M, Daneshgar F, Rabhi F et al. “A Generic Cloud Migration Process Model”. European Journal of
Information Systems 2019; 28(3): 233-255.
15. Pelizza A.“Towards a sociomaterial approach to inter-organizational boundaries: How information systems
elicit relevant knowledge in government outsourcing”, Journal of Information Technology 2021; 36(2): 94-108.
16. Gaebert C, Kautz K.“The contract-type choice for short-term software development outsourcing: The Role of Behaviour-Based Formal Control”, Journal of Information Technology 2021; 36(3): 241-257.
17. Du W, Pan SL, Wu J.“How do IT outsourcing vendors develop capabilities? An organizational ambidexterity
perspective on a multi-case study”. Journal of Information Technology 2020; 35(1): 49-65.
18. Karimi-Alaghehband F, Rivard S.“Information Technology Outsourcing and Architecture Dynamic Capabilities
as Enablers of Organizational Agility”. Journal of Information Technology 2019; 34(2): 129-159.
19. Nalebuff B, Brandenburger A. “Rethinking Negotiation: a smarter way to split the pie”, Harvard Business Review 2021: 110-119.
20. You J, Chen Y, Wang W et al. “Uncertainty, opportunistic behavior, and governance in construction projects: The Efficacy of Contracts”. International Journal of Project Management 2018; 36: 795-807.
21. Shivendu S, Zeng D, Gurbaxani V. “Optimal Asset Transfer in IT Outsourcing Contracts”, MIS Quarterly
2020; 44(2): 857-905
22. Denicol J, Davies A. “The Megaproject-Based Firm: Building Programme Management Capability to Deliver Megaprojects.” International Journal of Project Management 2022; 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2022.06.002
23. Frydlinger D, Hart O, Vitasec K. “A New Approach to Contracts: How to Build Better Long-Term Strategic
Partnerships”. Harvard Business Review 2019; 97(5): 116-129.
24. Blair G, Grant V, Woodcock H. Managing the Technology Life Cycle - A Contextual Approach to Analysis. Journal of Advanced Research In Engineering & Technology 2020; 4(1): 1-5. Retrieved from http://sijiret.com/
25. Blair G, Barratt S, Pagano R. ‘Serving the Public in the Post Pandemic World’: A Study of Project Management
in the Public Sector. Journal of Advanced Research in Alternative Energy, Environment and Ecology 2022; 9(1&2): 11-18.
26. Blair G, Pagano R. Virtual Cells for Collaborative and Experiential Learning in Distance Education, LTSE 2021
Conference Proceedings. Virtual 2021; 29: 23-26.
27. Blair G, Pagano R. Leadership and Context to Create the New Technological Society. Journal of Innovative
Research in Education & Management 2020; 4(1): 6-9. Retrieved from http://ijirem.com/wp-content/
uploads/2020/07/ICEM-2020-Dr.-Garry.pdf
28. Mishra AK, Chaudhary U. Assessment of Cement Handling Behaviour for Selected Construction Sites of Bhat Bhateni Supermarket. J Adv Res Const Urban Arch 2018; 3(3): 1-11.
29. Mishra AK, Chaudhary U. Cost Effectiveness Assessment of Different Nepalese Cement Brands for Selected Sites of Supermarket. J Adv Res Const Urban Arch 2018; 3(3): 12-33.
30. Mishra AK, Chaudhary U. Assessment of Cement Handling Behaviour For Selected Construction Sites of Bhatbhateni Supermarket. J Adv Res Const Urban Arch 2018; 3(3): 1-11.
31. Mishra AK, Jha A. Quality Assessment of Sarbottam Cement of Nepal. International Journal of Operations
Management and Services 2019: 9(1): 1-22.
32. Sah DP, Chaudhary S, Shakya R et al. Occupational Accidents in Cement Industries of Nepal. J Adv Res Alt Energ Env Eco 2019; 6(3&4): 22-28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24321/2455.3093.201904
33. Mishra AK, Shrestha A. Assessment of Exit Requirements for Fire Safety of Commercial Buildings, Kathmandu,
Nepal. International Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research 2017; 4(10): 248-255.
34. Mishra AK, Shrestha A. Fire Safety Preparedness among Occupants of Selected Commercial Buildings, Kathmandu, Nepal. International Journal of Creative Research Thoughts 2017; 5(4): 195-207. DOI: http://
ijcrt.org/viewfull.php?&_id=IJCRT1704025.
