A Review of Recent Advances in Computational Physics: From Simulations to Quantum Computing
Abstract
Computational physics is a dynamic and evolving field that integrates advanced computational techniques with physical theories to tackle complex, often unsolvable, problems in science and engineering. This review highlights recent advancements in computational physics, focusing on key areas such as numerical simulations, quantum computing, and machine learning applications. We examine significant improvements in numerical methods like the Finite Element Method (FEM) and Monte Carlo simulations, as well as the transformative potential of quantum computing for simulating quantum systems. Additionally, we explore the growing intersection of machine learning with computational physics, which has introduced innovative approaches to modeling, data analysis, and optimization. Finally, the review addresses the applications of these techniques in astrophysics, cosmology, and beyond, and discusses the challenges and future directions for the field. As computational power continues to evolve, these advancements promise to revolutionize our understanding of complex physical phenomena and pave the way for new technologies across various industries.
References
2. Badiei S, Holmlid L. Rydberg matter in space: low-density condensed dark matter. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 2002 Jun 21;333(2):360-4.
3. Oosterloo TA, Vedantham HK, Kutkin AM, Adams EA, Adebahr B, Coolen AH, Damstra S, De Blok WJ, Dénes H, Hess KM, Hut B. Extreme intra-hour variability of the radio source J1402+ 5347 discovered with Apertif. Astronomy & Astrophysics. 2020 Sep 1;641:L4.
4. Abbott BP, Abbott R, Abbott TD, Abernathy MR, Acernese F, Ackley K, Adams C, Adams T, Addesso P, Adhikari RX, Adya VB. Observation of gravitational waves from a binary black hole merger. Physical review letters. 2016 Feb 12;116(6):061102.
5. Hubble E. A relation between distance and radial velocity among extra-galactic nebulae. Proceedings of the national academy of sciences. 1929 Mar 15;15(3):168-73.
6. Jackson N. The hubble constant. Living reviews in relativity. 2015 Dec;18(1):2.
7. Lange JU, van den Bosch FC, Zentner AR, Wang K, Hearin AP, Guo H. Cosmological Evidence Modelling: a new simulation-based approach to constrain cosmology on non-linear scales. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 2019 Dec;490(2):1870-8.
8. Lowenthal JD, Koo DC, Guzmán R, Gallego J, Phillips AC, Faber SM, Vogt NP, Illingworth GD, Gronwall C. Keck spectroscopy of redshift z~ 3 galaxies in the Hubble deep field. The Astrophysical Journal. 1997 Jun 1;481(2):673.
9. De Putter R, Mena O, Giusarma E, Ho S, Cuesta A, Seo HJ, Ross AJ, White M, Bizyaev D, Brewington H, Kirkby D. New neutrino mass bounds from SDSS-III data release 8 photometric luminous galaxies. The Astrophysical Journal. 2012 Nov 20;761(1):12.
10. Canuto VM, Christensen-Dalsgaard J. Turbulence in astrophysics: Stars. Annual review of fluid mechanics. 1998 Jan;30(1):167-98.
11. Doherty CL, Gil-Pons P, Siess L, Lattanzio JC, Lau HH. Super-and massive AGB stars–IV. Final fates–initial-to-final mass relation. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 2015 Jan 21;446(3):2599-612.
12. Bina D, Pelló R, Richard J, Lewis J, Patrício V, Cantalupo S, Herenz EC, Soto K, Weilbacher PM, Bacon R, Vernet JD. MUSE observations of the lensing cluster Abell 1689. Astronomy & Astrophysics. 2016 Jun 1;590:A14.
13. Mukhopadhyay B. Description of pseudo-Newtonian potential for the relativistic accretion disks around Kerr black holes. The Astrophysical Journal. 2002 Dec 10;581(1):427.
14. Blanco-Pillado JJ, Olum KD, Wachter JM. Gravitational backreaction simulations of simple cosmic string loops. Physical Review D. 2019 Jul 15;100(2):023535.
15. Maitra D, Miller JM, Markoff S, King A. A jet model for the broadband spectrum of the Seyfert 1 galaxy NGC 4051. The Astrophysical Journal. 2011 Jun 22;735(2):107.
